Too many people are falling for the New Zealand Data trap. There are no alert signal in the New Zealand mortality trends and the data released is unusable.
I don’t think we have the final/correct mortality figures for the last few years yet. Lots of delays with coroner’s office. SpiderCat did an OIA on mortality numbers here in NZ and found a staggering discrepancy:
Pure anecdote, but I can rattle off a list of kids from my daughter’s school and my friends’ kids’ schools who have dropped dead of a clot/myocarditis since 2021 (including a six year old girl at my daughter’s school). This may well just be heightened awareness on my part, but I really hope accurate mortality figures emerge in the coming years so that we can properly check. Kind of feels like the whistleblower data has become a distraction. Time will tell, I guess (I hope).
I wrote about Malone - the guy who got $5 billion for "medical countermeasures" in the 2016/DOD contract. I also have to shed light on Steve Kirsch. They have a group that appears at all conferences as "experts." My simple question: is RW MALONE the Capture manager/lead
Crikey I can see I’m gonna have to out aside some time to write this all out. First of all we in NZ DO have excess all-cause mortality, as above commentators have pointed out and many many others. We can see it every day. This whole ‘whistleblower’ issue in NZ is a deliberate attempt to sabotage the authentic and long-running work from genuine experts to raise awareness of the risks from the jab. With this in mind., it is irrelevant whether Barry is for real or not. If you follow the money you’ll see that Liz Gunn has been ‘chosen’ specifically by them (the WHO?) to portray, in the worst possible way, any potential for this data to be used in our fight and to further divide our society. Our new, weak 3 party coalition Government has agreed to ‘reserve the decision’ about the WHO/IHR changes, and has promised to reverse all the nonsense woke legislation that tries to progress the WEF Agenda. Please try to look beyond the obvious media emotive manipulated crap to the real issues, and real people with real messages. Thank you.
Nice work. Yes, our side cheated a bit with short-cuts and a big rush to celebrate and claim a small victory prematurely when it was not necessary or particularly helpful to do so. If Igor Chudov did adapt his position, my reading of his second article is that he did not do so as a result of new facts and evidence being presented to him. He did so as a result of assurances and pressure from other freedom fighters. This could all be a significant own goal in the making.
I think there could be a causal signal in these data but it is going to take more careful work to tease it out. Another key background factor is the influx of healthy immigrants to NZ in 2019-2020: https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/national-population-estimates-at-30-june-2023/ Best I can tell this is the main reason for negative excess mortality in 2020, and reason to suspect mortality would have even risen on its own sans vax in 2022.
If you look at our Road Deaths, you’ll realise that NZ drivers are dangerous. Many reasons for that, not least because vehicle insurance is not mandatory (hence those who are without/banned licences etc are still on the road, along with drugged/drunk etc). During 2020 lockdowns, no one was driving anywhere - hence the reduction in overall deaths. Along with other factors obviously, but in a small population like ours, these contextual incidents matter.
Australia had almost no excess mortality for about a year after the jabs were rolled out, but the first big spike in excess mortality coincided with the first big spike in PCR positivity rate in January 2022. However the state of Western Australia got Omicron later than other states, so the PCR positivity rate remained close to zero until February 2022 but there was also no clear increase in excess deaths in January 2022, even though the daily number of new vaccines peaked in January like in other regions of Australia. In Taiwan and Hong Kong, the PCR positivity rate and excess mortality also remained close to 0% until 2022, but the first big spike in excess mortality coincided with the first spike in PCR positivity rate.
Out of the countries which already had high excess mortality in 2020, for example in Bolivia excess mortality peaked at about 245% in July 2020 the same month when PCR positivity rate peaked at about 58%, in Chile excess mortality peaked at about 52% in June the same month when PCR positivity rate peaked at about 31%, in Colombia excess mortality peaked at about 61% in August the same month when PCR positivity rate peaked at about 31%, and in South Africa excess mortality peaked at about 42% in July the same month when the PCR positivity rate peaked at about 25%.
In Peru a spike in excess deaths in early 2021 occurred around the same time in all age groups even though younger age groups got vaccinated much later than older age groups.
In many Southern American countries, the COVID deaths, excess deaths, and PCR positivity rate all fell close to zero around September 2021, even though some of the countries had a large number of new vaccines given around the same time. For example in Chile the PCR positivity rate went from less than 1% in September 2021 to about 32% in February 2022, and at the same time excess mortality went from about 3% in September 2021 to about 63% in February 2022. And a similar pattern was also followed by Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Argentina. (And if PCR positivity tests have a high rate of false positives like some people claim, then why has the percentage of positive tests often fallen below 1% in entire countries? The percentage of false positives cannot be higher than the total percentage of positives.)
On page 102 of Rancourt's paper, there's a plot which shows that the "vaccine dose fatality ratio" of the fourth dose divided by the third dose is much higher for Chile than for Peru. However that's because the fourth dose was rolled out earlier in Chile than Peru, so it coincided with the spike in deaths caused by Omicron in Chile but not Peru. From pages 76 to 79 of Rancourt's paper, you can see the peak in excess mortality in early 2022 occurred around the same time in all age groups, but younger age groups received the fourth dose later than older age groups, so in older age groups the peak in daily vaccine doses occurred before the peak in deaths, but in younger age groups the peak in daily vaccine doses occurred after the peak in deaths.
In 16 out of 17 countries in Rancourt's paper, excess mortality had a higher correlation with PCR positivity rate than with the daily number of new vaccines, and in 7 countries the correlation with the number of new vaccines was negative but the correlation with PCR positivity rate was not negative in any country.
Countries with a lower percentage of vaccinated population in 2021 tended to have higher excess mortality in 2021, with a correlation of about -0.47. For example out of the four Asian countries in Rancourt's paper, Singapore had both the highest percentage of vaccinated people and the lowest excess mortality, but Philippines had both the lowest percentage of vaccinated people and the highest excess mortality. And similarly out of the South American countries in Rancourt's paper, Chile and Uruguay were the two countries with the lowest excess mortality in 2021 but they were also the two countries with the highest percentage of vaccinated people in 2021.
Rancourt claimed that there were no COVID measures or treatments that were performed synchronously around the world in January to February 2022, even though actually in all countries featured in his paper that have hospitalization data available at OWID, there was a spike in hospitalizations for COVID around January or February 2022.
On a list of explanations for why there was a synchronous spike in deaths all over the world around January to February 2022, Rancourt failed to include the possibility that there was a deliberate release of Omicron. Omicron, Alpha, and Delta all emerged in a saltation event where multiple novel nonsynonymous spike mutations appeared simultaneously out of nowhere. If you compare the spike protein of a consensus sequence of XBB.1.5 Omicron sequences to Wuhan-Hu-1, there's a total of 41 nonsynonymous mutations but only 1 synonymous mutations, which results in a dN/dS ratio of 41, even though among 100 SARS1 sequences the average dN/dS ratio was about 3.6 and in H1N1 samples from Finland from 2009 it was around 0.2-1.2. If the spike of Wuhan-Hu-1 is compared to BANAL-52, there's 176 synonymous mutations but only 20 nonsynonymous mutations, so the XBB.1.5 consensus has over double the number of nonsynonymous mutations. In the nucleocapsid protein of B.1.1, Alpha, BA.1, and BA.2, there's an unusual series of three consecutive nucleotide changes at positions 28,881-28,883, but a similar phenomenon was not previously known to occur in nature, so the authors of a Japanese paper had to coin a new term called "en bloc exchange" to describe the phenomenon. And even in the scenario where Omicron was not released deliberately or it was only released deliberately at a single location, it could've still spread around the world faster than the Wuhan strain because it has been estimated to have a much higher R₀ value than the Wuhan strain.
Rancourt's paper included a series of age-stratified plots for two countries, which were Chile and Peru, but he included plots for all age groups in Peru but only for ages 60 and above in Chile. There were two spikes in deaths in Chile which Rancourt blamed on the vaccines, but the reason why Rancourt omitted the plots for younger age groups in Chile may have been if the spikes in deaths occurred in younger age groups before the vaccine doses were rolled out, because then he wouldn't have been able to blame the deaths on the vaccines. I have asked him why he omitted the plots but he hasn't answered me. The website which Rancourt used as his source for mortality data in Chile no longer seems to be functional, so I asked Rancourt to upload the data on his website, but he hasn't responded.
Thanks for all of your great detailed work. It seems both you and Rancourt could be right in the sense that both prior vax and saltation events cause increases in PCR positivity rates and deaths. We need to build solid causal inference models.
"We have clients who have been misdiagnosed with Lyme disease, ALS,
and then they've eventually ruled all those things out and the culprit remaining is the gadolinium," said the couple's attorney Todd Walburg.
THE ENTIRE PROBLEM IS IN QUANTUM DOTS/NANOTECHNOLOGY.
This was never a "virus" - it was toxicity of nanotechnology/CTN (carbon nanotubes), quantum dots, and so on. The mechanisms of toxicity are well-known
Nanoparticles, nowadays, are the focus of medical sciences with various applications like drug delivery, TRACKING, and alternatives to antibiotics such as nanomedicine [18,19,20].
However, nanoparticles also have adverse effects toward human health.
Nanoparticles exert various kinds of toxicity, they can be cancerous, affect our immune system, liver, spleen, can generate cellular ROS, damage our DNA, or they can also affect our metabolism through blocking or disrupting various enzymatic pathways [21,22].
'Sweet' quantum dots light the way for new HIV and Ebola treatment
(Nanowerk News) A research team led by the University of Leeds has observed for the first time how HIV and Ebola viruses attach to cells to spread infection. The findings, published today in the journal Angewandte Chemie ("Compact, Polyvalent Mannose Quantum Dots as Sensitive, Ratiometric FRET Probes for Multivalent Protein-Ligand Interactions"), offer a new way of treating such viruses: instead of destroying the pathogens, introduce a block on how they interact with cells.
“A recent study of particular objects known as "nanotubes," revered for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity, demonstrated that such objects tend to clump within the lungs, causing suffocation.”
“Take the experience of researchers at DuPont, who are testing microscopic tubes of carbon, known as nanotubes, valued for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity.
When the researchers injected nanotubes into the lungs of rats in the summer of 2002, the animals unexpectedly began gasping for breath. Fifteen percent of them quickly died. ''It was the highest death rate we had ever seen,''
said David B. Warheit, the research leader, who began his career studying asbestos and has been testing the pulmonary effects of various chemicals for DuPont since 1984.
Early research has raised troubling issues. DuPont and others, for example, found evidence that the cells that break down foreign particles in rodent lungs have more trouble detecting and handling nanoparticles than larger particles that have long been studied by air pollution experts.
Lungs are not the only concern.
Research shows that nanoparticles deposited in the nose can make their way directly into the brain.
They can also change shape as they move from liquid solutions to the air, making it harder to draw general conclusions about their potential impact on living things. “
A German study found clear evidence that if discrete nanometer diameter particles were deposited in the nasal region (in rodents in this case), they completely circumvented the blood/brain barrier, and travelled up the olfactory nerves straight into the brain (GRAPHENE-BASED “PCR test”: https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
GFNs (graphene-family nanomaterials) can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation, oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection.)
Inhaled carbon nanotubes can suppress the immune system by affecting the function of T cells, a type of white blood cell that organises the immune system to fight infections. (“masks”: Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets - ScienceDirect
Thank you. Do you know what Cts were run at any one time with the RT-PCR test in those countries?
Also, as we’re dealing with all-cause, excess mortality (often having been seen at unprecedented rates since 2021), the now well established pre-vaccination IFRs of Wuhan could not possibly account for the excess deaths, let alone Omicron in well vaccinated countries.
My understanding is the tests are non-specific pan-coronavirus. They signal detection of *a* coronavirus not necessarily *the* coronavirus.
Therefore doesn't really matter what the ct count is. All you're going to get is (possibly) sars-cov2 plus signals from every other coronavirus out there.
The tests are therefore a massive fraud in this context.
I live in New Zealand. We do have excess mortality and I am personally aware of people who have suffered serious injury post vaccine. These people need to be given assistance and support. While you all argue over semantics they are left struggling. Many of their injuries do not meet our ACC criteria for support as they are new and unprecedented. This problem has occured due to a lack of long term safety data something unlikely to be resolved as the placebo controls were eliminated and authorities will not release any data that could undermine the "safe and effective" mantra.
Let's be clear: Steve Kirsch and the whole bunch are NOT YOUR FRIENDS. They are the ones behind this war. It's not enough for them to read about the atrocities, they prefer to take pictures with the victims
I don’t think we have the final/correct mortality figures for the last few years yet. Lots of delays with coroner’s office. SpiderCat did an OIA on mortality numbers here in NZ and found a staggering discrepancy:
https://www.aussie17.com/p/startling-surge-in-deaths-of-new?utm_campaign=post
Pure anecdote, but I can rattle off a list of kids from my daughter’s school and my friends’ kids’ schools who have dropped dead of a clot/myocarditis since 2021 (including a six year old girl at my daughter’s school). This may well just be heightened awareness on my part, but I really hope accurate mortality figures emerge in the coming years so that we can properly check. Kind of feels like the whistleblower data has become a distraction. Time will tell, I guess (I hope).
This is a problem 🧐
Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
Problem solved, government incompetence.
https://open.substack.com/pub/pharmafiles/p/startling-surge-in-deaths-of-new?r=1ltk77&utm_campaign=comment-list-share-cta&utm_medium=web&comments=true&commentId=44921564
Oh nice! Thanks for that.
I wrote about Malone - the guy who got $5 billion for "medical countermeasures" in the 2016/DOD contract. I also have to shed light on Steve Kirsch. They have a group that appears at all conferences as "experts." My simple question: is RW MALONE the Capture manager/lead
author for the C-19 injections?
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-w-malone
http://web.archive.org/web/20210611163439/https://static1.squarespace.com/static/550b0ac4e4b0c16cdea1b084/t/58e5406b5016e1f1acacae75/1491419246742/RWM+CV+March+2017.pdf
IDIQ Award to TASC by U.S. Army for Medical Product Research
and Development. (W81XWH-15-D-0042)
Capture manager, lead
author.
2016 $5 Billion
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-malone-the-5-billion-contract
https://outraged.substack.com/p/r-w-malone-speaks-out
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-malone-and-countermeasures
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-w-malone-d0c
https://outraged.substack.com/p/operation-warp-speed-father-robert
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-w-malone-vaccines-on-demand
Crikey I can see I’m gonna have to out aside some time to write this all out. First of all we in NZ DO have excess all-cause mortality, as above commentators have pointed out and many many others. We can see it every day. This whole ‘whistleblower’ issue in NZ is a deliberate attempt to sabotage the authentic and long-running work from genuine experts to raise awareness of the risks from the jab. With this in mind., it is irrelevant whether Barry is for real or not. If you follow the money you’ll see that Liz Gunn has been ‘chosen’ specifically by them (the WHO?) to portray, in the worst possible way, any potential for this data to be used in our fight and to further divide our society. Our new, weak 3 party coalition Government has agreed to ‘reserve the decision’ about the WHO/IHR changes, and has promised to reverse all the nonsense woke legislation that tries to progress the WEF Agenda. Please try to look beyond the obvious media emotive manipulated crap to the real issues, and real people with real messages. Thank you.
New Zealand was isolated as you say. Covid19 Deaths did not explode until the Ides of March 2022
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/new-zealand/
So they can be factored in to all-cause mortality when more data appears.
Nice work. Yes, our side cheated a bit with short-cuts and a big rush to celebrate and claim a small victory prematurely when it was not necessary or particularly helpful to do so. If Igor Chudov did adapt his position, my reading of his second article is that he did not do so as a result of new facts and evidence being presented to him. He did so as a result of assurances and pressure from other freedom fighters. This could all be a significant own goal in the making.
I think there could be a causal signal in these data but it is going to take more careful work to tease it out. Another key background factor is the influx of healthy immigrants to NZ in 2019-2020: https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/national-population-estimates-at-30-june-2023/ Best I can tell this is the main reason for negative excess mortality in 2020, and reason to suspect mortality would have even risen on its own sans vax in 2022.
If you look at our Road Deaths, you’ll realise that NZ drivers are dangerous. Many reasons for that, not least because vehicle insurance is not mandatory (hence those who are without/banned licences etc are still on the road, along with drugged/drunk etc). During 2020 lockdowns, no one was driving anywhere - hence the reduction in overall deaths. Along with other factors obviously, but in a small population like ours, these contextual incidents matter.
Very nice perl skills!
I do everything with perl
And he likes Perl... You always raise in my esteem 😂 !
Thanks mate. Very nice dives, as always !
The video summary 😂🎯
Well, I first did a much meaner version.. But then I considered I could be wrong, and Barry could be honest, so I made it nicer 😬
🌏⚰️ A new clip with Denis Rancourt, which has a focus on the southern hemisphere (Bright Light News): https://fb.watch/oLIbBiBfkY/?
I addressed some problems with Rancourt's paper here: https://mongol-fi.github.io/nopandemic.html#Rancourts_paper_about_southern_hemisphere_and_equatorial_countries.
Australia had almost no excess mortality for about a year after the jabs were rolled out, but the first big spike in excess mortality coincided with the first big spike in PCR positivity rate in January 2022. However the state of Western Australia got Omicron later than other states, so the PCR positivity rate remained close to zero until February 2022 but there was also no clear increase in excess deaths in January 2022, even though the daily number of new vaccines peaked in January like in other regions of Australia. In Taiwan and Hong Kong, the PCR positivity rate and excess mortality also remained close to 0% until 2022, but the first big spike in excess mortality coincided with the first spike in PCR positivity rate.
Out of the countries which already had high excess mortality in 2020, for example in Bolivia excess mortality peaked at about 245% in July 2020 the same month when PCR positivity rate peaked at about 58%, in Chile excess mortality peaked at about 52% in June the same month when PCR positivity rate peaked at about 31%, in Colombia excess mortality peaked at about 61% in August the same month when PCR positivity rate peaked at about 31%, and in South Africa excess mortality peaked at about 42% in July the same month when the PCR positivity rate peaked at about 25%.
In Peru a spike in excess deaths in early 2021 occurred around the same time in all age groups even though younger age groups got vaccinated much later than older age groups.
In many Southern American countries, the COVID deaths, excess deaths, and PCR positivity rate all fell close to zero around September 2021, even though some of the countries had a large number of new vaccines given around the same time. For example in Chile the PCR positivity rate went from less than 1% in September 2021 to about 32% in February 2022, and at the same time excess mortality went from about 3% in September 2021 to about 63% in February 2022. And a similar pattern was also followed by Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Argentina. (And if PCR positivity tests have a high rate of false positives like some people claim, then why has the percentage of positive tests often fallen below 1% in entire countries? The percentage of false positives cannot be higher than the total percentage of positives.)
On page 102 of Rancourt's paper, there's a plot which shows that the "vaccine dose fatality ratio" of the fourth dose divided by the third dose is much higher for Chile than for Peru. However that's because the fourth dose was rolled out earlier in Chile than Peru, so it coincided with the spike in deaths caused by Omicron in Chile but not Peru. From pages 76 to 79 of Rancourt's paper, you can see the peak in excess mortality in early 2022 occurred around the same time in all age groups, but younger age groups received the fourth dose later than older age groups, so in older age groups the peak in daily vaccine doses occurred before the peak in deaths, but in younger age groups the peak in daily vaccine doses occurred after the peak in deaths.
In 16 out of 17 countries in Rancourt's paper, excess mortality had a higher correlation with PCR positivity rate than with the daily number of new vaccines, and in 7 countries the correlation with the number of new vaccines was negative but the correlation with PCR positivity rate was not negative in any country.
Countries with a lower percentage of vaccinated population in 2021 tended to have higher excess mortality in 2021, with a correlation of about -0.47. For example out of the four Asian countries in Rancourt's paper, Singapore had both the highest percentage of vaccinated people and the lowest excess mortality, but Philippines had both the lowest percentage of vaccinated people and the highest excess mortality. And similarly out of the South American countries in Rancourt's paper, Chile and Uruguay were the two countries with the lowest excess mortality in 2021 but they were also the two countries with the highest percentage of vaccinated people in 2021.
Rancourt claimed that there were no COVID measures or treatments that were performed synchronously around the world in January to February 2022, even though actually in all countries featured in his paper that have hospitalization data available at OWID, there was a spike in hospitalizations for COVID around January or February 2022.
On a list of explanations for why there was a synchronous spike in deaths all over the world around January to February 2022, Rancourt failed to include the possibility that there was a deliberate release of Omicron. Omicron, Alpha, and Delta all emerged in a saltation event where multiple novel nonsynonymous spike mutations appeared simultaneously out of nowhere. If you compare the spike protein of a consensus sequence of XBB.1.5 Omicron sequences to Wuhan-Hu-1, there's a total of 41 nonsynonymous mutations but only 1 synonymous mutations, which results in a dN/dS ratio of 41, even though among 100 SARS1 sequences the average dN/dS ratio was about 3.6 and in H1N1 samples from Finland from 2009 it was around 0.2-1.2. If the spike of Wuhan-Hu-1 is compared to BANAL-52, there's 176 synonymous mutations but only 20 nonsynonymous mutations, so the XBB.1.5 consensus has over double the number of nonsynonymous mutations. In the nucleocapsid protein of B.1.1, Alpha, BA.1, and BA.2, there's an unusual series of three consecutive nucleotide changes at positions 28,881-28,883, but a similar phenomenon was not previously known to occur in nature, so the authors of a Japanese paper had to coin a new term called "en bloc exchange" to describe the phenomenon. And even in the scenario where Omicron was not released deliberately or it was only released deliberately at a single location, it could've still spread around the world faster than the Wuhan strain because it has been estimated to have a much higher R₀ value than the Wuhan strain.
Rancourt's paper included a series of age-stratified plots for two countries, which were Chile and Peru, but he included plots for all age groups in Peru but only for ages 60 and above in Chile. There were two spikes in deaths in Chile which Rancourt blamed on the vaccines, but the reason why Rancourt omitted the plots for younger age groups in Chile may have been if the spikes in deaths occurred in younger age groups before the vaccine doses were rolled out, because then he wouldn't have been able to blame the deaths on the vaccines. I have asked him why he omitted the plots but he hasn't answered me. The website which Rancourt used as his source for mortality data in Chile no longer seems to be functional, so I asked Rancourt to upload the data on his website, but he hasn't responded.
Thanks for all of your great detailed work. It seems both you and Rancourt could be right in the sense that both prior vax and saltation events cause increases in PCR positivity rates and deaths. We need to build solid causal inference models.
This test is sensitive, but it doesn't diagnose, which means it is a crap.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/quantum-dots-pcr-tests
Pay attention, people are FALSELY DIAGNOSED WITH LYME DISEASE AFTER MRI contrast agent
https://outraged.substack.com/p/chuck-norris-against-quantum-dots
"We have clients who have been misdiagnosed with Lyme disease, ALS,
and then they've eventually ruled all those things out and the culprit remaining is the gadolinium," said the couple's attorney Todd Walburg.
THE ENTIRE PROBLEM IS IN QUANTUM DOTS/NANOTECHNOLOGY.
This was never a "virus" - it was toxicity of nanotechnology/CTN (carbon nanotubes), quantum dots, and so on. The mechanisms of toxicity are well-known
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221622/ A Novel Biocompatible Titanium–Gadolinium Quantum Dot as a Bacterial Detecting Agent with High Antibacterial Activity - PMC (nih.gov)
Nanoparticles, nowadays, are the focus of medical sciences with various applications like drug delivery, TRACKING, and alternatives to antibiotics such as nanomedicine [18,19,20].
However, nanoparticles also have adverse effects toward human health.
Nanoparticles exert various kinds of toxicity, they can be cancerous, affect our immune system, liver, spleen, can generate cellular ROS, damage our DNA, or they can also affect our metabolism through blocking or disrupting various enzymatic pathways [21,22].
https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jat.4180 Toxicity of quantum dots on target organs and immune system (wiley.com)
'Sweet' quantum dots light the way for new HIV and Ebola treatment
(Nanowerk News) A research team led by the University of Leeds has observed for the first time how HIV and Ebola viruses attach to cells to spread infection. The findings, published today in the journal Angewandte Chemie ("Compact, Polyvalent Mannose Quantum Dots as Sensitive, Ratiometric FRET Probes for Multivalent Protein-Ligand Interactions"), offer a new way of treating such viruses: instead of destroying the pathogens, introduce a block on how they interact with cells.
THE ENTIRE LIE AND PROBLEM IN THIS NANOTECH
https://outraged.substack.com/p/stop-quantum-tagging
NightMarks are tiny nanocrystal quantum dots that can be hidden in clear liquids and seen only through a sensor like night-vision goggles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfKfyQlHt64 Quantum-Secure Authentication (CBDC)
https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1119251 Is Nanotechnology Prohibited by the Biological and Chemical Weapons Conventions
“A recent study of particular objects known as "nanotubes," revered for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity, demonstrated that such objects tend to clump within the lungs, causing suffocation.”
“Take the experience of researchers at DuPont, who are testing microscopic tubes of carbon, known as nanotubes, valued for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity.
When the researchers injected nanotubes into the lungs of rats in the summer of 2002, the animals unexpectedly began gasping for breath. Fifteen percent of them quickly died. ''It was the highest death rate we had ever seen,''
said David B. Warheit, the research leader, who began his career studying asbestos and has been testing the pulmonary effects of various chemicals for DuPont since 1984.
Early research has raised troubling issues. DuPont and others, for example, found evidence that the cells that break down foreign particles in rodent lungs have more trouble detecting and handling nanoparticles than larger particles that have long been studied by air pollution experts.
Lungs are not the only concern.
Research shows that nanoparticles deposited in the nose can make their way directly into the brain.
They can also change shape as they move from liquid solutions to the air, making it harder to draw general conclusions about their potential impact on living things. “
A German study found clear evidence that if discrete nanometer diameter particles were deposited in the nasal region (in rodents in this case), they completely circumvented the blood/brain barrier, and travelled up the olfactory nerves straight into the brain (GRAPHENE-BASED “PCR test”: https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
GFNs (graphene-family nanomaterials) can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation, oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection.)
Inhaled carbon nanotubes can suppress the immune system by affecting the function of T cells, a type of white blood cell that organises the immune system to fight infections. (“masks”: Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets - ScienceDirect
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879 The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals. Blood-air barrier
https://outraged.substack.com/p/quantum-dots-pcr-tests
etc.
This is a total scam, it is a sensitive nanotechnology, not a virus, and nanotech makes people sick
Thank you. Do you know what Cts were run at any one time with the RT-PCR test in those countries?
Also, as we’re dealing with all-cause, excess mortality (often having been seen at unprecedented rates since 2021), the now well established pre-vaccination IFRs of Wuhan could not possibly account for the excess deaths, let alone Omicron in well vaccinated countries.
My understanding is the tests are non-specific pan-coronavirus. They signal detection of *a* coronavirus not necessarily *the* coronavirus.
Therefore doesn't really matter what the ct count is. All you're going to get is (possibly) sars-cov2 plus signals from every other coronavirus out there.
The tests are therefore a massive fraud in this context.
Yes, while these parasites did well: https://open.substack.com/pub/ianbrighthope/p/hey-billionaire-controligarch-one?r=20pd6j&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
I live in New Zealand. We do have excess mortality and I am personally aware of people who have suffered serious injury post vaccine. These people need to be given assistance and support. While you all argue over semantics they are left struggling. Many of their injuries do not meet our ACC criteria for support as they are new and unprecedented. This problem has occured due to a lack of long term safety data something unlikely to be resolved as the placebo controls were eliminated and authorities will not release any data that could undermine the "safe and effective" mantra.
I don't like your tone!
Grab a handkerchief, and don't hesitate if you have an actual substantiated critic to voice.
all these detractors, did they have the clot shot? are they willing to debate Dr Yeadon live?
Tell us "I'm a bot" without telling us "I'm a bot".
Let's be clear: Steve Kirsch and the whole bunch are NOT YOUR FRIENDS. They are the ones behind this war. It's not enough for them to read about the atrocities, they prefer to take pictures with the victims
The fact that it does go down in 2023, and that we are way below normal variations.
https://openvaet.substack.com/p/the-new-zealand-whistleblower-data