I wrote this some time again as a response to people believing that the fraud of the COVID vaccine program was about the use of relative risk rather than absolute risk.
We are in year five of debate about purported threat and deployed countermeasure but biology basics are still largely missing from discussion among leading voices.
First is persistent myth that RNA molecules get miraculous powers when CRISPR keyboard gene jockeys cobble together magical sequences that are called Gain of Function when it's a batch of pure clones grown in E.coli... zero biology to support the idea that clones change the Laws of Nature.. even NIH funded GoF Review details it is vaccine development tool to do vaccine stockpile plans & do not reflect "wild type virus" which are like shooting stars in the galaxy & can't be grown from a bat's ass or human.. it's model mythology.
Next is the fact that five years into this clown show of frauds the decades old bench science tool known as TRANSFECTION is still being called vaccines. Aside from syringe delivery & fact that attempts to augment the immune system with Trojan Horse attack inside all the immune system barriers to induce a T-cell response is the most idiotic theory ever these never were or will be vaccines. As an old Beltway Bandit this fraud smells like IP rebranding campaign.
Always my pleasure knowledge is power that multiplies when we pass it on, lucky us! Despite decades tracking Rockefeller-Gates Biotech Mafia the biggest breakthrough finding the science fraud is brilliant teacher, broadly censored Dr. Jonathan Jay Couey for debunking much of the biology fraud for me. <3
I used to quite like him as you'll see from my defence of his arguments back in 2023, but later that year he was targeted by people we have identified as federal (bad) actors and he turned somewhat. So now he spends his time telling us how everybody apart from him is the problem. It's a shame but I suspect he is being blackmailed like they have tried to do with a number of us.
For me it's irrelevant whether folks are liked or not the issue that matters is the quality of information.. much like whistleblower dumps some are more interested in the source than the substance of leaks. yawn!
As an old Beltway Bandit with lots of whistleblowers and targets in my orbit the idea that Jay is being blackmailed is laughable but the notion of being financially crushed and throttled in cyberspace pretty real.
What matters more is the biology and vocabulary that seems to be missing from discussion. Do you have any science to refute the claims?
Where's the error for RNA can not pandemic?
Refute TRANSFECTION in humans was always criminal and calling it an investigational vaccine an ongoing fraud & skip the personality takes.
What about push back for the idea that intramuscular injection of any combination of substances w intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb. Explain how he's wrong please because decades of reading Biotech Mafia science had me confused but fraud seems clear now but happy if you have a better argument w mechanisms to produce T-cell immunity w anything jabbed in a syringe, thanks! :~)
When JJ sticks to the science, he presents himself and the information he is providing very effectively and very credibly. However, when he spends too much time complaining about others and what they should have done, or what they should be doing, he alienates those who would otherwise support him. Ranting about this probably alienates some of his listeners.
I do understand his frustration, however and I very much respect him for his expertise and for his courage and integrity.
My data is in real time, day after day. No vaccines or mRNA poisons in over 50 years and I am alive and healthy nearing age 75. No drugs either for more than a few weeks and very seldom. What could any doctoring do at this point? All big pharma drugs have the potential to cause numerous harms and even death.
As it happened I was skeptical of those Israel studies because no one else published similar. It’s hard to make everyone lie but you can make many shut up.
Though the real-world studies are definitely trash and vaccines probably had a net negative efficacy, I don’t think I buy this argument. Changes in background covid rates, testing rates, who is getting tested, and PCR sensitivity/false-positivity all confound the comparisons of the five studies in question. These studies also seem to enroll people whose last vaccination was “at least x months before”. So these would be people whose alleged vaccine efficacy against cases had basically waned to zero already. Also, median age in Dagan was 45, whereas it was 53 in Moreira and 72 in Magan. Age could be the main explainer here.
A different idea for how to falsify the real-world studies:
As time passes, natural immunity becomes more prevalent. Hence, “true” vaccine efficacy should decline over time, provided such VE is defined as including people with prior infection. Perhaps the best place to look for data to support this are hybrid immunity studies. If I am not misremembering, these studies at times say things like “natural immunity is 90% effective, whereas hybrid immunity is 95% effective”. Wording like this would imply that there are three groups in such studies: the unvaccinated with no past infection (control group), the unvaccinated with past infection (natural immunity group), and the vaccinated with past infection (hybrid immunity group). If the two unvaccinated groups can be merged together, then there may be enough data in these studies to calculated a new “true” VE, relative to being unvaccinated, regardless of prior covid status. Then one can see if this VE decreases in subsequent studies as time passes. If it does not, something is wrong. The main reason this idea would not be possible is because the two unvaccinated groups were not simply derived from a single data sample that was sorted into two groups, but rather were a result of separate queries.
Another thing to try is this:
Look up the latest systematic review of vaccine efficacy of any particular dose. Sort the reported peak VE’s of all studies according to dates that were studied. See if peak VE’s decline over time or not. They should decline, as increasing natural immunity should level the playing field in all groups. No such decline either implies systematic bias or a relative nonexistence of covid as a real entity. Can repeat this same analysis for all specific number of booster doses. Again, such studies would had to have not excluded people with prior infection.
The Australian Government is still promoting the juice - as well as finishing off building 3 mRNA factories so they can pump out millions of these technologies into people - not sure why they haven't got it yet - as well as many others who still are lining up for their jabs here in Australia - the CENSORSHIP - AD HOMINEM and IGNORING is their strategy - as well as the media control
Is there any Serious Adverse Health Issue the Pfizer & Moderna injections don't cause?
This means they are desperate to keep their 'Licence to Kill' ZERO LIABILITY clause for the few remaining believers in their depopulating injections.
I will continue to reveal my thoughts about the man-modified Covid scam and the DEADLY mRNA injections they pretended were 'vaccines'.
2024 started to get interesting with various truths coming to light. Like Zuckerberg admitting he curtailed and omitted FREE SPEECH on his FACEBOOK platform, after supposedly being pressured by the Biden's corrupt US Government to keep Covid details and Vax dangers hidden from the world. He thinks we don't realise he was enthusiastic about the entire NWO Plot!
At the end of 2024, 16 US States have banned the promotion of Covid mRNA (Deadly) injections.
Hopefully, 2025 will see the corrupt Big Pharma (Covid & Vax Scam) House of Cards disintegrate.
We hope this trend becomes an avalanche of realisation that the whole thing was a man-made Scam to 'depopulate' and imprison the remaining population to become SLAVES of the 'Elite'.
Who knows, maybe even Trump might prove to be 'genuine' by making Big Pharma LIABLE for the injuries and DEATHS caused by their dangerous, but shielded' injected poisons?
Unjabbed Mick (UK) We live longer by avoiding corrupt medics with poisonous mRNA syringes.
Well done. I will be using this in a continuing fight. Truth is good...data manipulation and fake science bad...hanging bad. Where will all these people go with a hole in their foot...beaches would not be appropriate...that hole would still be showing. They are caught red-handed...liars.
Why waste time with fraudulent data? Many vaccinated were classified as unvaccinated, because they were less than 14 or 21 days after vaccination. Meaningless science.
I'm sorry to have to say this. I know it may be hard to believe with a superficial research, but there was no such thing as "Covid". The fraud is much deeper. There was no real bird flu pandemic in 2007, and the alleged swine flu pandemic 2009/2010 was also a proven fraud. Have people forgotten all these frauds so quickly? After such experiences, how can you assume that "Covid" is real? There are no waves of spread of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 at all. Or have you ever seen a graphic representation of this somewhere? Before the WHO declared the plandemic on March 11, 2020, there was nothing unusual. It was only on that day that the deadly hospital protocols became mandatory, so that some deaths occurred. People died mainly from incorrectly treated bacterial pneumonia. You can find all the evidence here. I've put a lot of work into putting the evidence together on a Substack :
Unfortunately, I didn't see any answers to my questions. Why? Are you not aware of these facts, or do you find the questions uncomfortable? By the way, yes, I know that Dr Yeadon is genuine because I know him. And no, I didn't dig through his documents because firstly, I have no reason to, secondly, that would be too rude, and thirdly, I wouldn't ask you or any of the other "Covid" preachers about the origin of his pay cheque. I do have one question, though. Have you ever seen the common flu just disappear before? Don't you find that strange?
Of course not. But the official bodies claimed so. THAT WAS the alleged "Covid". Here are the official data, which clearly show the disappeared flu on the graphs:
What you call "evidence" is a Mike Yeadon - ex Pfizer VP - video, whose main quality is to "look nice". It doesn't contain the shadow of an actionable element, and Yeadon's claim to be "the most censored voice" is plainly hilarious, while he is on every platform and that his absence from Twitter is, I suspect, simply related to his incapacity to flush his 2020 cookies (or a plain lie).
Yeadon's sole purpose - aside to make us all pass for lunatics (with great success) is to discard any responsibility from the perpetrators of gain of function researches.
There are no practical differences between our positions (in fact Arkmedic and Jikkyleaks's work have been instrumental in establishing the existence of the iatrogenocide of the elderly while Yeadon has brought forward a total of 0 useful elements), aside for the fact that in your perspective, GoF isn't a thing to be concerned about - let alone to shut down in the nearest delay. I guess Porton Down and Fort Dietrich are just nice places where kind but misguided people are working for the betterment of mankind.
In the meantime, I guess people damaged by said virus are just suffering from the consequence of psychosomatic trauma and fear.
Lastly, this Substack contains among the best evidence against the testing and authorization of the Pfizer "vaccine". I wonder why Yeadon has absolutely never relayed these - or even Augusto Roux or Brook Jackson's testimonies.
Feel free to believe in that pack of nonsense, but please make sure that what you relay here calling it "evidence" contains at least one element which can be qualified as such.
I only have 3 questions for you. Perhaps you could be so kind and briefly inform me and the readers about them?
- Can you please tell me if you believe that the 2007 bird flu "pandemic", the 2009/2020 swine flu "pandemic" and the current "monkeypox" and "bird flu" are real? If so, I would understand why you also believe that "Covid" is real.
- The second question relates to the waves of spread of the alleged SARS-CoV-2. Have you already seen a graphic representation of such waves? If so, can you please link me to this information so that I can see it?
- The third question is the last one. Have you already seen the studies by Prof. Denis Rancourt? What do you think of them? What do you think about the fact that the first "Covid" deaths only came with the declaration of the "pandemic" by the WHO on March 11, 2020, when the new hospital protocols became mandatory? I am not concerned with whether you accept the iatrogenic deaths, but with the missing deaths before March 11, 2020. Why were there no “Covid” deaths BEFORE?
Thank you in advance for your answers.
Best wishes,
Suavek
PS.
Because I assume that you believe in the accuracy of PCR tests, I am not even asking about it.
You'll be pleased to know that I wrote a whole article on the geronticide and the exact "accuracy" (sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and false discovery rate) of COVID, with evidence and references and a significant understanding of biomedical statistics that your colleagues failed to grasp.
You should read it and get the other PANDA crew to read it too, so they can stop with the "there was no pandemic therefore our buddies at DARPA can't be held responsible for all the deaths" line which comes before the "don't forget to buy your pandemic insurance from Swiss Re so we can make some more money on fake pandemics"
Your achievement in exposing the "Covid" fraud is as remarkable as it is humorous. Thank you for both. But can you please end the never-ending story in the jungle of details and just tell me whether you believe the "pandemics" I mentioned above are facts or not? I have several thousand people in the audience who are waiting with great longing for professional clarification. What should I say to these people? Were all of these "pandemics" real or not? As far as "Covid" is concerned, do I really have to read the entire article you linked to today? You write at the beginning of the linked article that it is very, very long. As a doctor, you certainly don't want me to strain my modern attention span to the point that I get sick from this enormous effort, do you?
I'm not concerned with whether viruses exist in general, but rather with "Covid", because as far as I know, no specific "Covid symptom" has been found so far, and unfortunately the flu "disappeared" at exactly the time when doctors were testing their patients en masse just for "Covid". Is this just a coincidental correlation, without any significance?
I'm sorry to ask the same questions again, but I'm really interested in the alleged "Covid". I don't even care whether this disease invented by propaganda can be symptom-free or not, because I know that I will never get any of the diseases invented by the terrorist organization WHO every few years. Moreover, as far as I know, all diseases that, according to the WHO, can be symptom-free are lies, because every medical student knows that there are no diseases without symptoms. So the topic of "PCR tests" and their "sensitivity" seems completely superfluous to me. I am really sorry that you have done so much futile work on these topics. I wish you, that fate can protect you from such mistakes in 2025. If the basis of research is wrong, then the result cannot be expected to correspond to the truth. But you certainly already know that.
1. Do I believe that "pandemics" are timely unlocked when the economic system is close from collapse, of course. Do I believe that they would pull something like COVID and abuse the entire scientific establishment without taking care of seeding an actual pathogen agent, no.
2. Yes, there are evidence of spread in the US data for example. You guys haven't done the work.
3. Yes, I'm aware of Rancourt ; I think he is a crank running from debate with qualified people, and that his only use is to make everyone pass for idiots, same as Yeadon. Nobody said that COVID appeared with media announcements.
PCR is not a diagnosis test in absentee of symptoms, merely a confirmation of diagnosis. But I would be delighted to know why COVID sequences aren't found anywhere pre-end-2019.
"But I would be delighted to know why COVID sequences aren't found anywhere pre-end-2019."
I'm happy to answer your question about why the "Covid" sequences were not found before the end of 2019. There are two different hypotheses about this. One came from Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, who exposed and ended the swine flu hoax in 2009/2010. This PROVEN plandemic was a test before the "Covid" hoax (like the alleged "bird flu" plandemic in 2007). Dr Wodarg said that SARS-CoV-2 is one of the approximately 180 different viruses that make up the seasonal flu disease each year. Before 2020, no one was looking for this virus, and no one was testing for it. No one was interested in such viruses, and so they mostly remained unnamed. According to Dr Wodarg, this virus only became interesting in 2020 because it made it possible to do something, namely the worldwide brainwashing that so many honest doctors continue to believe, or want to believe, because they fear for their work licences. That's why they prefer to lie in public.
There were reports that SARS-CoV-2 existed before. Apparently, some human samples from that time were subsequently tested. But I don't believe that any more than I believe the lab leak or the GoF origin. The alleged findings of the virus in previous samples are just as credible as the PCR tests, i.e. not at all. And both the lab leak and the GoF origin are far too effective at spreading panic to be real. Are you really so naive to believe that Fauci's emails could have been hacked just like that? Excuse me for saying it like that, but please don't make yourself look ridiculous with such naivety. It only damages your reputation. The thing is that in 2019 you could only discover diseases that had been tested for, but not those that never existed, neither in 2019 nor in 2020. How can you even ask why no disease was detectable in 2019 that never existed anyway and was just invented? Where is the logic here?
However, I suggest Dr Mike Yeadon's theory because everything he has said so far is logically understandable. You just have to take some time to think about it. Without the PCR test, there would be no "Covid". And knowing that the manufacturers of these tests are protected by strict "state secrets" (or NATO secrets), you can assume that this virus does not exist at all in real life. Nobody knows what these things really react to. Or do you really think that the current inventions of monkeypox and bird flu are real because the PCR test "said" so? You have been able to very skilfully avoid my questions about these "pandemics". Are these questions uncomfortable for you because the truth could bring down your theory? All of these invented diseases are based on the PCR fraud. So is mad cow disease, and God knows what else. However, Dr Yeadon's theory seems implausible to some people because they hear the lies of frightened doctors everywhere, and through their herd instinct, they tend to falsely believe the majority on the Internet. Moreover, it takes a certain amount of imagination to believe that such a fraud could work worldwide ( https://suavek1.substack.com/p/what-did-they-do-the-shortest-explanation?utm_source=publication-search ). To do this, you would first have to look at the more than 20-year planning phase of the "Covid" fraud, ( https://suavek1.substack.com/p/paul-schreyer-how-the-corona-fraud ) and understand the depth of the corruption. All of this takes some time and is frightening. People protect themselves from such stress so as not to feel completely helpless. The truth is nerve-wracking, but people want to be able to sleep well. The belief that a psychopathic clique wants to rule the world and has invented "Covid" to do so is not exactly helpful in sleeping soundly. It is frightening and is therefore very popular to avoid.
Even simpler than that. When you use relative risk instead of absolute risk, it’s because you know your results are BS.
I wrote this some time again as a response to people believing that the fraud of the COVID vaccine program was about the use of relative risk rather than absolute risk.
I hope it explains why that is not the case.
https://www.arkmedic.info/p/dont-be-arrsey
Another word for data manipulator is criminal.
Rules for Thee not Me!
We are in year five of debate about purported threat and deployed countermeasure but biology basics are still largely missing from discussion among leading voices.
First is persistent myth that RNA molecules get miraculous powers when CRISPR keyboard gene jockeys cobble together magical sequences that are called Gain of Function when it's a batch of pure clones grown in E.coli... zero biology to support the idea that clones change the Laws of Nature.. even NIH funded GoF Review details it is vaccine development tool to do vaccine stockpile plans & do not reflect "wild type virus" which are like shooting stars in the galaxy & can't be grown from a bat's ass or human.. it's model mythology.
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
Next is the fact that five years into this clown show of frauds the decades old bench science tool known as TRANSFECTION is still being called vaccines. Aside from syringe delivery & fact that attempts to augment the immune system with Trojan Horse attack inside all the immune system barriers to induce a T-cell response is the most idiotic theory ever these never were or will be vaccines. As an old Beltway Bandit this fraud smells like IP rebranding campaign.
If the goal is to find the truth let's start with biology and terms that define function. Anyone who has experience at medical schools or vaccine development have known since 1999 Jesse Gelsinger case that human bodies NEVER tolerate foreign proteins and TRANSFECTING humans was always criminal. https://web.archive.org/web/20121025034826/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/28/magazine/the-biotech-death-of-jesse-gelsinger.html
Thank you for your informative comment and for the links to the 2016 report and the 1999 NY Times article.
Very damning evidence that they knew this information and did it anyway.
Always my pleasure knowledge is power that multiplies when we pass it on, lucky us! Despite decades tracking Rockefeller-Gates Biotech Mafia the biggest breakthrough finding the science fraud is brilliant teacher, broadly censored Dr. Jonathan Jay Couey for debunking much of the biology fraud for me. <3
https://gigaohmbiological.com/
https://stream.gigaohm.bio/c/gigaohm_biological/videos
As a coincidence, I just finished watching/listening to Dr. JJ Couey's comments in this video:
https://odysee.com/@Oisin.page:f/Were-you-informed-:c
More damning evidence that they knew better and did it anyways.
I agree with your comment that " knowledge is power that multiplies when we pass it on".
Thanks again
You can catch him live now even better!
https://www.twitch.tv/gigaohmbiological
I used to quite like him as you'll see from my defence of his arguments back in 2023, but later that year he was targeted by people we have identified as federal (bad) actors and he turned somewhat. So now he spends his time telling us how everybody apart from him is the problem. It's a shame but I suspect he is being blackmailed like they have tried to do with a number of us.
For me it's irrelevant whether folks are liked or not the issue that matters is the quality of information.. much like whistleblower dumps some are more interested in the source than the substance of leaks. yawn!
As an old Beltway Bandit with lots of whistleblowers and targets in my orbit the idea that Jay is being blackmailed is laughable but the notion of being financially crushed and throttled in cyberspace pretty real.
What matters more is the biology and vocabulary that seems to be missing from discussion. Do you have any science to refute the claims?
Where's the error for RNA can not pandemic?
Refute TRANSFECTION in humans was always criminal and calling it an investigational vaccine an ongoing fraud & skip the personality takes.
What about push back for the idea that intramuscular injection of any combination of substances w intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb. Explain how he's wrong please because decades of reading Biotech Mafia science had me confused but fraud seems clear now but happy if you have a better argument w mechanisms to produce T-cell immunity w anything jabbed in a syringe, thanks! :~)
When JJ sticks to the science, he presents himself and the information he is providing very effectively and very credibly. However, when he spends too much time complaining about others and what they should have done, or what they should be doing, he alienates those who would otherwise support him. Ranting about this probably alienates some of his listeners.
I do understand his frustration, however and I very much respect him for his expertise and for his courage and integrity.
Corruption is everywhere.
My data is in real time, day after day. No vaccines or mRNA poisons in over 50 years and I am alive and healthy nearing age 75. No drugs either for more than a few weeks and very seldom. What could any doctoring do at this point? All big pharma drugs have the potential to cause numerous harms and even death.
As it happened I was skeptical of those Israel studies because no one else published similar. It’s hard to make everyone lie but you can make many shut up.
Though the real-world studies are definitely trash and vaccines probably had a net negative efficacy, I don’t think I buy this argument. Changes in background covid rates, testing rates, who is getting tested, and PCR sensitivity/false-positivity all confound the comparisons of the five studies in question. These studies also seem to enroll people whose last vaccination was “at least x months before”. So these would be people whose alleged vaccine efficacy against cases had basically waned to zero already. Also, median age in Dagan was 45, whereas it was 53 in Moreira and 72 in Magan. Age could be the main explainer here.
A different idea for how to falsify the real-world studies:
As time passes, natural immunity becomes more prevalent. Hence, “true” vaccine efficacy should decline over time, provided such VE is defined as including people with prior infection. Perhaps the best place to look for data to support this are hybrid immunity studies. If I am not misremembering, these studies at times say things like “natural immunity is 90% effective, whereas hybrid immunity is 95% effective”. Wording like this would imply that there are three groups in such studies: the unvaccinated with no past infection (control group), the unvaccinated with past infection (natural immunity group), and the vaccinated with past infection (hybrid immunity group). If the two unvaccinated groups can be merged together, then there may be enough data in these studies to calculated a new “true” VE, relative to being unvaccinated, regardless of prior covid status. Then one can see if this VE decreases in subsequent studies as time passes. If it does not, something is wrong. The main reason this idea would not be possible is because the two unvaccinated groups were not simply derived from a single data sample that was sorted into two groups, but rather were a result of separate queries.
Another thing to try is this:
Look up the latest systematic review of vaccine efficacy of any particular dose. Sort the reported peak VE’s of all studies according to dates that were studied. See if peak VE’s decline over time or not. They should decline, as increasing natural immunity should level the playing field in all groups. No such decline either implies systematic bias or a relative nonexistence of covid as a real entity. Can repeat this same analysis for all specific number of booster doses. Again, such studies would had to have not excluded people with prior infection.
No problem. Let's have the data. The original raw patient level data from Clalit.
Then we'll see what actually happened
The Australian Government is still promoting the juice - as well as finishing off building 3 mRNA factories so they can pump out millions of these technologies into people - not sure why they haven't got it yet - as well as many others who still are lining up for their jabs here in Australia - the CENSORSHIP - AD HOMINEM and IGNORING is their strategy - as well as the media control
Is there any Serious Adverse Health Issue the Pfizer & Moderna injections don't cause?
This means they are desperate to keep their 'Licence to Kill' ZERO LIABILITY clause for the few remaining believers in their depopulating injections.
I will continue to reveal my thoughts about the man-modified Covid scam and the DEADLY mRNA injections they pretended were 'vaccines'.
2024 started to get interesting with various truths coming to light. Like Zuckerberg admitting he curtailed and omitted FREE SPEECH on his FACEBOOK platform, after supposedly being pressured by the Biden's corrupt US Government to keep Covid details and Vax dangers hidden from the world. He thinks we don't realise he was enthusiastic about the entire NWO Plot!
At the end of 2024, 16 US States have banned the promotion of Covid mRNA (Deadly) injections.
Hopefully, 2025 will see the corrupt Big Pharma (Covid & Vax Scam) House of Cards disintegrate.
We hope this trend becomes an avalanche of realisation that the whole thing was a man-made Scam to 'depopulate' and imprison the remaining population to become SLAVES of the 'Elite'.
Who knows, maybe even Trump might prove to be 'genuine' by making Big Pharma LIABLE for the injuries and DEATHS caused by their dangerous, but shielded' injected poisons?
Unjabbed Mick (UK) We live longer by avoiding corrupt medics with poisonous mRNA syringes.
Thank u Dr. Syed for your honesty.
Well done. I will be using this in a continuing fight. Truth is good...data manipulation and fake science bad...hanging bad. Where will all these people go with a hole in their foot...beaches would not be appropriate...that hole would still be showing. They are caught red-handed...liars.
Israeli 'real world' studies were not plausible for other reasons. Highly recommend this piece, written immediately when Dagan was published in 2021: https://kevinmd.com/2021/03/a-physician-questions-the-covid-vaccine-data-from-israel.html
real world data - VAERS and DMED reports
Do you know the excessive death rate in Israel post-COVID or COVID vaccines versus the death rate before November 2019? Pre-October 7 2023, perhaps?
Why waste time with fraudulent data? Many vaccinated were classified as unvaccinated, because they were less than 14 or 21 days after vaccination. Meaningless science.
Because these data were used in courts around the world to stop people earning a living.
You (or they) are playing an illogical, rigged game. False data can be used to prove any (true or false) conclusions. Tell the courts this!
My comment on this article: :
https://openvaet.substack.com/p/how-the-israeli-data-used-to-sell
Best wishes,
Suavek
...................................................................
I'm sorry to have to say this. I know it may be hard to believe with a superficial research, but there was no such thing as "Covid". The fraud is much deeper. There was no real bird flu pandemic in 2007, and the alleged swine flu pandemic 2009/2010 was also a proven fraud. Have people forgotten all these frauds so quickly? After such experiences, how can you assume that "Covid" is real? There are no waves of spread of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 at all. Or have you ever seen a graphic representation of this somewhere? Before the WHO declared the plandemic on March 11, 2020, there was nothing unusual. It was only on that day that the deadly hospital protocols became mandatory, so that some deaths occurred. People died mainly from incorrectly treated bacterial pneumonia. You can find all the evidence here. I've put a lot of work into putting the evidence together on a Substack :
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-yeadon-the-silver-bullet-bite
https://suavek1.substack.com/
Best wishes,
Suavek
I love how you PANDA-type people insist on mixing truth with fiction to give a vague aroma of credibility.
If you believe Mike Yeadon to be genuine, have you seen a copy of his NDA with Pfizer?
Thank you, Dr Syed, for your comment.
Unfortunately, I didn't see any answers to my questions. Why? Are you not aware of these facts, or do you find the questions uncomfortable? By the way, yes, I know that Dr Yeadon is genuine because I know him. And no, I didn't dig through his documents because firstly, I have no reason to, secondly, that would be too rude, and thirdly, I wouldn't ask you or any of the other "Covid" preachers about the origin of his pay cheque. I do have one question, though. Have you ever seen the common flu just disappear before? Don't you find that strange?
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-missing-flu
If you have ever experienced this, can you please tell me when and where?
Best regards,
Suavek
Flu didn't disappear ; and it kept being diagnosed by doctors you guys never talk to because they would laugh at your theories.
"John Cullen" sources. The guy can't read the disclaimer of the website he uses for 4 years. It's getting better and better.
Of course not. But the official bodies claimed so. THAT WAS the alleged "Covid". Here are the official data, which clearly show the disappeared flu on the graphs:
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-missing-flu
Just as credible as "Covid" were the films in China that showed people dropping dead on the streets because of "Covid".
What you call "evidence" is a Mike Yeadon - ex Pfizer VP - video, whose main quality is to "look nice". It doesn't contain the shadow of an actionable element, and Yeadon's claim to be "the most censored voice" is plainly hilarious, while he is on every platform and that his absence from Twitter is, I suspect, simply related to his incapacity to flush his 2020 cookies (or a plain lie).
Yeadon's sole purpose - aside to make us all pass for lunatics (with great success) is to discard any responsibility from the perpetrators of gain of function researches.
There are no practical differences between our positions (in fact Arkmedic and Jikkyleaks's work have been instrumental in establishing the existence of the iatrogenocide of the elderly while Yeadon has brought forward a total of 0 useful elements), aside for the fact that in your perspective, GoF isn't a thing to be concerned about - let alone to shut down in the nearest delay. I guess Porton Down and Fort Dietrich are just nice places where kind but misguided people are working for the betterment of mankind.
In the meantime, I guess people damaged by said virus are just suffering from the consequence of psychosomatic trauma and fear.
Lastly, this Substack contains among the best evidence against the testing and authorization of the Pfizer "vaccine". I wonder why Yeadon has absolutely never relayed these - or even Augusto Roux or Brook Jackson's testimonies.
Feel free to believe in that pack of nonsense, but please make sure that what you relay here calling it "evidence" contains at least one element which can be qualified as such.
I only have 3 questions for you. Perhaps you could be so kind and briefly inform me and the readers about them?
- Can you please tell me if you believe that the 2007 bird flu "pandemic", the 2009/2020 swine flu "pandemic" and the current "monkeypox" and "bird flu" are real? If so, I would understand why you also believe that "Covid" is real.
- The second question relates to the waves of spread of the alleged SARS-CoV-2. Have you already seen a graphic representation of such waves? If so, can you please link me to this information so that I can see it?
- The third question is the last one. Have you already seen the studies by Prof. Denis Rancourt? What do you think of them? What do you think about the fact that the first "Covid" deaths only came with the declaration of the "pandemic" by the WHO on March 11, 2020, when the new hospital protocols became mandatory? I am not concerned with whether you accept the iatrogenic deaths, but with the missing deaths before March 11, 2020. Why were there no “Covid” deaths BEFORE?
Thank you in advance for your answers.
Best wishes,
Suavek
PS.
Because I assume that you believe in the accuracy of PCR tests, I am not even asking about it.
You'll be pleased to know that I wrote a whole article on the geronticide and the exact "accuracy" (sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and false discovery rate) of COVID, with evidence and references and a significant understanding of biomedical statistics that your colleagues failed to grasp.
You should read it and get the other PANDA crew to read it too, so they can stop with the "there was no pandemic therefore our buddies at DARPA can't be held responsible for all the deaths" line which comes before the "don't forget to buy your pandemic insurance from Swiss Re so we can make some more money on fake pandemics"
https://www.arkmedic.info/p/there-was-no-virus
Dear Dr Syed,
Your achievement in exposing the "Covid" fraud is as remarkable as it is humorous. Thank you for both. But can you please end the never-ending story in the jungle of details and just tell me whether you believe the "pandemics" I mentioned above are facts or not? I have several thousand people in the audience who are waiting with great longing for professional clarification. What should I say to these people? Were all of these "pandemics" real or not? As far as "Covid" is concerned, do I really have to read the entire article you linked to today? You write at the beginning of the linked article that it is very, very long. As a doctor, you certainly don't want me to strain my modern attention span to the point that I get sick from this enormous effort, do you?
I'm not concerned with whether viruses exist in general, but rather with "Covid", because as far as I know, no specific "Covid symptom" has been found so far, and unfortunately the flu "disappeared" at exactly the time when doctors were testing their patients en masse just for "Covid". Is this just a coincidental correlation, without any significance?
I'm sorry to ask the same questions again, but I'm really interested in the alleged "Covid". I don't even care whether this disease invented by propaganda can be symptom-free or not, because I know that I will never get any of the diseases invented by the terrorist organization WHO every few years. Moreover, as far as I know, all diseases that, according to the WHO, can be symptom-free are lies, because every medical student knows that there are no diseases without symptoms. So the topic of "PCR tests" and their "sensitivity" seems completely superfluous to me. I am really sorry that you have done so much futile work on these topics. I wish you, that fate can protect you from such mistakes in 2025. If the basis of research is wrong, then the result cannot be expected to correspond to the truth. But you certainly already know that.
All the best, and Happy New Year !
Suavek
1. Do I believe that "pandemics" are timely unlocked when the economic system is close from collapse, of course. Do I believe that they would pull something like COVID and abuse the entire scientific establishment without taking care of seeding an actual pathogen agent, no.
2. Yes, there are evidence of spread in the US data for example. You guys haven't done the work.
3. Yes, I'm aware of Rancourt ; I think he is a crank running from debate with qualified people, and that his only use is to make everyone pass for idiots, same as Yeadon. Nobody said that COVID appeared with media announcements.
PCR is not a diagnosis test in absentee of symptoms, merely a confirmation of diagnosis. But I would be delighted to know why COVID sequences aren't found anywhere pre-end-2019.
You're welcome.
Your text :
"But I would be delighted to know why COVID sequences aren't found anywhere pre-end-2019."
I'm happy to answer your question about why the "Covid" sequences were not found before the end of 2019. There are two different hypotheses about this. One came from Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, who exposed and ended the swine flu hoax in 2009/2010. This PROVEN plandemic was a test before the "Covid" hoax (like the alleged "bird flu" plandemic in 2007). Dr Wodarg said that SARS-CoV-2 is one of the approximately 180 different viruses that make up the seasonal flu disease each year. Before 2020, no one was looking for this virus, and no one was testing for it. No one was interested in such viruses, and so they mostly remained unnamed. According to Dr Wodarg, this virus only became interesting in 2020 because it made it possible to do something, namely the worldwide brainwashing that so many honest doctors continue to believe, or want to believe, because they fear for their work licences. That's why they prefer to lie in public.
There were reports that SARS-CoV-2 existed before. Apparently, some human samples from that time were subsequently tested. But I don't believe that any more than I believe the lab leak or the GoF origin. The alleged findings of the virus in previous samples are just as credible as the PCR tests, i.e. not at all. And both the lab leak and the GoF origin are far too effective at spreading panic to be real. Are you really so naive to believe that Fauci's emails could have been hacked just like that? Excuse me for saying it like that, but please don't make yourself look ridiculous with such naivety. It only damages your reputation. The thing is that in 2019 you could only discover diseases that had been tested for, but not those that never existed, neither in 2019 nor in 2020. How can you even ask why no disease was detectable in 2019 that never existed anyway and was just invented? Where is the logic here?
However, I suggest Dr Mike Yeadon's theory because everything he has said so far is logically understandable. You just have to take some time to think about it. Without the PCR test, there would be no "Covid". And knowing that the manufacturers of these tests are protected by strict "state secrets" (or NATO secrets), you can assume that this virus does not exist at all in real life. Nobody knows what these things really react to. Or do you really think that the current inventions of monkeypox and bird flu are real because the PCR test "said" so? You have been able to very skilfully avoid my questions about these "pandemics". Are these questions uncomfortable for you because the truth could bring down your theory? All of these invented diseases are based on the PCR fraud. So is mad cow disease, and God knows what else. However, Dr Yeadon's theory seems implausible to some people because they hear the lies of frightened doctors everywhere, and through their herd instinct, they tend to falsely believe the majority on the Internet. Moreover, it takes a certain amount of imagination to believe that such a fraud could work worldwide ( https://suavek1.substack.com/p/what-did-they-do-the-shortest-explanation?utm_source=publication-search ). To do this, you would first have to look at the more than 20-year planning phase of the "Covid" fraud, ( https://suavek1.substack.com/p/paul-schreyer-how-the-corona-fraud ) and understand the depth of the corruption. All of this takes some time and is frightening. People protect themselves from such stress so as not to feel completely helpless. The truth is nerve-wracking, but people want to be able to sleep well. The belief that a psychopathic clique wants to rule the world and has invented "Covid" to do so is not exactly helpful in sleeping soundly. It is frightening and is therefore very popular to avoid.
Best wishes,
Suavek